decision sent to author nature communications

Answer: From the description of the status change of the submission, it seems the manuscript did not pass the formatting check by the editorial staff and required corrections from the author. Once your articleis accepted for publication, you can track its status with the track your accepted article tool. 430,805 Altmetric mentions (2021), The Journal Impact Factor is defined as all citations to the journal in the current JCR year to items published in the previous two years, divided by the total number of scholarly items (these comprise articles, reviews, and proceedings papers) published in the journal in the previous two years. Please let me know of your decision at your earliest . (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. Because we were unable to independently measure the quality of the manuscripts, this quality-dependent selection, if present, remains undetermined in our study. Decisions are to be made by consensus. We investigated the proportion of OTR papers (OTR rate) under both peer review models to see if there were any differences related to gender or institution. Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission, https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001820, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01102.x, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. Until this is done, the decision can be changed. Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. Transfer of papers between Cell Press journals and Molecular Plant. 2.2 The model of bounded rationality. In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. The height of the rectangles is related to the significance and the width to the amount of data that support the result. The editorial and peer review processwill continue through the peer review systemsas usual. More information regarding the release of these data can be found here. The corresponding author does not need to be the first author . Time: 2023-03-04T15:53:14+00:00. If that article is rejected, the journal name and public peer review timeline will be removed but the preprint and any versions of it, if any, will remain public. . The original authors are given 10 days to respond. Here, we define the corresponding author as the author who is responsible for managing the submission process on the manuscript tracking system and for all correspondence with the editorial office prior to publication. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Springer Nature but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Research Integrity and Peer Review Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. making DBPR compulsory to accelerate data collection and remove potential bias against the review model. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;179(6):14157. Posted on 31st May 2022 by 31st May 2022 by reparationstapet kllare Monitoring dairy cattle behavior can improve the detection of health and welfare issues for early interventions. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The 5-year journal Impact Factor, available from 2007 onward, is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year. The proportion of authors that choose double-blind review is higher when they submit to more prestigious journals, they are affiliated with less prestigious institutions, or they are from specific countries; the double-blind option is also linked to less successful editorial outcomes. If you want to find out more about when to expect a decision from the Editor, click here. We believe that Impact Factor is just one of a number of metrics that can be used to evaluate a journal, and a small number of highly cited papers can have a disproportionate effect on the mean number of citations per paper. Whereas in the more conventional single-blind peer review (SBPR) model, the reviewers have knowledge of the authors identity and affiliations [1]; under DBPR, the identity and affiliations of the authors are hidden from the reviewers and vice versa. In the ten countries with the highest number of submissions, we found a large significant association between country and review type (p value <0.001, df=10, Cramers V=0.189). . 0000001589 00000 n Tregenza T. Gender bias in the refereeing process? To obtain BMC Med. In order to assign a measure of institutional prestige to each manuscript, we used the 2016/2017 Times Higher Education rankings (THE [20]) and normalised the institution names using the GRID API. national association of state directors of developmental disabilities service, how many years did juan carlos serve as king. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. HUM6WEX:hQR{pe"3>g7`,. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Bruce R, Chauvin A, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, Boutron I. 9 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 11 /H [ 1335 254 ] /L 93263 /E 83910 /N 2 /T 92966 >> endobj xref 9 45 0000000016 00000 n When can I expect a decision from the Editor? We would like to thank Michelle Samarasinghe for the help in collecting the data from the manuscript tracking system and Sowmya Swaminathan for the comments on the study and feedback on the manuscript draft. Once all author information has been resolved and extraneous or incorrect information removed, the system will guide you to the Manuscript Information tab. Tulare Ca Obituaries, After peer review, a decision of accept, reject, or revision is made on the basis of the reviewers comments and the judgment of the editor. Connect with us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with news and development. We employed hypothesis testing techniques to test various hypotheses against the data. 2016;14(1):85. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. We investigated the relationship between review type and institutional prestige (as measured by the institution groups) by testing the null hypothesis that the review type is independent from prestige. These results suggest that the choice of DBPR may be linked with a higher perceived risk of discrimination, with the exception of gender discrimination. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Most journals assign a manuscript number upon initial submission and send an automated notice to advise you of the number (if not now, the manuscript number will be assigned when the first editor is assigned). 2016;1(2):1637. ISSN 2041-1723 (online). Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. So, in October 2018, we added a new . Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a way to resolve disputes outside the judiciary courts.The dispute will be decided by one or more persons (the 'arbitrators', 'arbiters' or 'arbitral tribunal'), which renders the 'arbitration award'. hoi4 what to do when capitulate. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Settings. . Add a footnote to the article displaying the electronic link to the correction notice. The outcome both at first decision and post review is significantly more negative (i.e. Journals can customize the wording of status terms. This is because authors cannot modify their choice of review model at the transfer stage, and thus transfers cannot contribute to the uptake analysis. The decision post-review of whether to accept a paper or not is taken by the editor but is based on the feedback received from the referees, so we assume that the decision at this stage would reflect a potential referee bias. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. Papers. For this, we used a test for equality of proportions with continuity correction. This is a statistically significant result, with a small effect size; the results of Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=1533.9, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.147. . Includes a detailed report with feedback and, for journal manuscripts, publishing advice and journal recommendations based on our editors' detailed assessment of your findings. We investigated any potential differences in uptake depending on the journal tier. In order to detect any bias towards institutional prestige, we referred to a dataset containing 20,706 records, which includes OTR papers that were either rejected or accepted, as well as transfers. Nature. 1991;81(5):104167. If you still have questions about what In Review can do for you or how it works, read our FAQ. Nature Portfolio is a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (see here for more information about our endorsement). A useful set of articles providing general advice about writing and submitting scientific papers can Manuscript # . No, Modified on: Mon, 5 Sep, 2022 at 6:52 PM. Corresponding author defined. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Malay S, Zhong L, Weinstein A, Rohrich RJ. Post Decision Manuscripts Decision summarynature. If we compare the proportion of accepted manuscripts under DBPR and authored by female vs. male corresponding authors (26 vs. 25%) with a test for equality of proportions with continuity correction, we find that there is a not a significant difference in female authors and male authors for DBPR-accepted papers (results of two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction: 2=0.03188, df=1, p value=0.8583). We observed a trend in which the OTR rate for both DBPR and SBPR papers decreases as the prestige of the institution groups decreases, and we tested for the significance of this. 0000001568 00000 n r/biology I buried a dead rat (killed by delayed rat poison or a neighbor's cat) in an iron barrel with soil on Sep 8. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. We identify two potential causes for this, one being a difference in quality and the other being a gender bias. . But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Why did this happen? 8. We then analysed the uptake by gender for the entire portfolio, as we were interested in finding any gender-related patterns. The author can request that the deadline be extended by writing to the editor in advance. This may occur as a consequence of positive referee bias towards institution groups or to quality factors. Springer is committed to your publishing success: If your research is of good quality, then it may be suitable for another journal. This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? The UC's agreement with Springer Nature is a three-year-plus agreement, through 2023, that increases both UC's access to Springer Nature journals and support for the open access publication of UC research. Watch the Checking the status of your submission video for more information. How do I check the status of my manuscript? Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. 0000047805 00000 n You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. Nature 2015;518(7539):274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/518274b. All other data has been produced by Clarivate Analytics. In the past if your work wasn't accepted in Nature or Science researchers would often try the respected general journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, or PNAS - which wags dubbed "Probably Not . by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Correct the online article. Nature-branded journals publishing primary research introduced DBPR as an optional service in March 2015 in response to authors requests [17].