uk foreign aid budget by country list

This is an increase of 5 million from last year, with Fiji being the largest country specific recipient. You have accepted additional cookies. The size of the circles indicates the amount of ODA spent on that sector in that country relative to the other sectors and other countries. , For breakdowns of spend to the top 20 recipients, see Table 6 on the publication landing page. In 2019, UK bilateral ODA received by Afghanistan increased compared with 2018 to 292 million (an increase of 43m) (Figure 6). , For further analysis on DAC country donors, see the OECD report on donors provisional figures. For example the UKs contribution to the World Bank International Development Association. The strategy is published in the context of reduced UK aid spending and the Government's wider foreign policy intentions to increase UK efforts in Africa and the Indo-Pacific, partly in response to China. While there has been an increase since 2018, the total bilateral ODA to Africa remains below this peak (7m less than levels in 2017). This was an increase of 211 million (or 1.9%) compared with 2018, ODA spend by departments other than DFID and other contributors of UK ODA was 4,090 million in 2019, an increase of 434 million, or 11.9%, on 2018, Africa remained the largest recipient of UK region-specific bilateral ODA in 2019 accounting for 50.6%, the top 3 recipients of UK bilateral country specific ODA were Pakistan (305m), Ethiopia (300m) and Afghanistan (292m), UK bilateral ODA to Yemen was 260 million, an increase of 94 million compared to 2018 - this was the largest increase to any country in 2019, the largest amount of bilateral ODA was focused on Humanitarian Aid (1,536m), Health (1,431m) and Multisector/ Cross-Cutting (1,325m) sectors. These broad sectors can then be further grouped into major sectors, bringing together related themes to help simplify the key messages. For more detail on the grant-equivalent impact on other donors see Final SID 2018. These shares should be taken as indicative estimates rather than exact amounts of funding, and they are dependent upon multilateral organisations returning disbursement data to the DAC. A small proportion of non-DFID spend is estimated, for example Gift Aid on ODA eligible activity. Total bilateral aid commitments to Ukraine 2022-2023, by country and type. This increased to 115.1 billion for final ODA for 2018 an increase of 0.3 per cent. This is an increase in spend (5,659m in 2018) but a decrease in terms of percentage share from 2018 (61.3% in 2018). [footnote 19]. Figure 18 shows the top 15 recipient countries of total ODA from the DAC donor countries in 2018 and the UKs share of ODA in these recipient countries. In addition, the CSSFs Rapid Response Mechanism allows funding to be released immediately, across government departments to respond to a crisis. To understand more about ODA eligible Gift Aid, please see methodology note. In comparison, over the previous five years (2014 to 2018) bilateral ODA represented on average 62.4%. Figure 13 provides a breakdown of sector spend by DFID and all Other Government Departments and other contributors of ODA (non-DFID). The government says the cut to the foreign aid budget save will save around 4bn a year. Between the spring and the autumn, the ODA spending of government departments and other ODA contributors are finalised. This primarily is linked to food and shelter for up to 12 months. For example, delivering family planning services across Malawi through an NGO, 4,939 million of UK ODA spend was delivered through core contributions to multilateral organisations. The risk of input error is relatively low for estimates of total spend, and by country/region, and relatively higher for spending by sector (where there is sometimes ambiguity, especially for projects or programmes that cut across sectors) and by funding channel. Highlighted countries are those in receipt of UK bilateral ODA, and colours are based on amount received (dark blue=higher amounts UK Bilateral ODA received, light blue=lower amounts UK Bilateral ODA received). These extra details allow the ODA spend to be quality assured using guidance from OECD. This was driven by increased spending by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and DFID. According to a note from OECD, the top countries that donated money in 2020 are the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, and France. This spend in the top 5 countries represents 28.3% of the total country-specific UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a slight reduction from 2018 when they comprised 31.2% of the total (Figure 6), in 2019 the top 3 recipients of UK bilateral country specific ODA were Pakistan (305m), Ethiopia (300m) and Afghanistan (292m) (Figure 6). Almost 40% of the aid budget is currently . In 2019, 97.1% of DFIDs region-specific bilateral ODA went to countries in Africa and Asia (4,224m). Dark blue = Pakistan, light blue = Ethiopia, grey = Afghanistan, pink = Yemen, teal = Nigeria. We use some essential cookies to make this website work. Most policymakers understand that foreign assistance is a key instrument of U.S. foreign policy, but they also need to recognize that disruptions . In particular, DFIDs bilateral ODA spend increased by 711 million, to 7,064 million in 2019. This was an increase of 83 million compared to 2018, reflecting increased spending by FCO and DFID. It includes all low, lower-middle and upper-middle income countries, except for those that are members of the G8 or the European Union (including countries with a firm accession date for EU membership). Other Technical Assistance includes training and research, a further 8.6% consists of core support to Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) or other delivery partners, such as research institutions, where funds are not earmarked for a particular country/region and work may benefit a wide range of developing countries. Spend increased by 56 million on 2018 to 207 million in 2019. Almost 25% of that budget has gone to just ten countries: Ethiopia ($1.13 billion) Jordan ($1.03 billion) Afghanistan . This was primarily driven by an increase in humanitarian aid spending (45m increase on 2018) with material relief assistance and services being provided for Rohingya refugees, Tanzania moved out of the top 10 recipients of UK bilateral ODA, this was partly driven by a decrease in spend to programmes focused on social and economic infrastructure and services (Figure 7), total UK bilateral ODA received by LDCs and Other LICs increased by 13.1% (328m) from 2,496 million in 2018 to 2,823 million in 2019 (Figure 8). Figure 8: Country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2009-2019. Figure 17 legend: ODA spend in terms of GNI comparing 2018 and 2019 spend for each DAC donor country (ODA:GNI ratio). FCO remained the largest spender of CSSF ODA funds, (69.1% of total CSSF ODA). In 2019 the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) used ODA from its core departmental budget and the Joint Funds (Conflict, Stability and Security Fund, and Prosperity Fund) to support and deliver the strategic objectives of the governments 2015 Aid Strategy and support delivery of the UNs Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Individual departments that bid for funding are accountable for their own spending and delivery under the given fund. Accordingly, they enable individual donor governments, such as the UK, to support development and humanitarian work in a wider range of countries. In comparison, Norways ODA spend (3.4bn) was roughly an eighth of the United States but its ODA:GNI ratio was 1.02% showing that Norway spends a larger share of its national income on ODA. Spend in Pakistan was mainly focused on Education (38.4%) as well as Government and Civil Society (16.4%) (see Section 4.2.3 for more information on sector specific breakdowns), Ethiopia has remained the second largest recipient of bilateral ODA although spend slightly decreased in 2019 from 2018 - a decrease of 2 million. As mentioned above, the ODA:GNI ratio is based on confirmed ODA spend and estimates of GNI published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). In 2019 (the most recent year for which comprehensive numbers have been released), the U.S. spent over $47 billion on foreign aid - about the same as 2018 and $1 billion more than in 2017. The estimate for the UKs share of the EU ODA budget in 2019 is 983 million compared to 951 million in 2018. Figure 3 (and Table 2) shows 2019 ODA spend by government department and other contributors of UK ODA, as well as changes in ODA spend from 2018. UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) spend was 15,197 million, an increase of 645 million (4.4% increase) on 2018, UK bilateral ODA spend was 10,258 million (67.5% of total UK ODA) while UK core funding to multilaterals was 4,939 million (32.5% of total UK ODA), DFID spent 11,107 million of ODA in 2019. This was part of a UN pact including another 30 wealthy countries such as the United States, Japan, Germany, Denmark and Sweden. The first table is based on official development assistance (ODA) figures published by the OECD for members of its Development Assistance Committee (DAC). See Annex 1 for more detail. Health - 1,431 million (14.0%). A report from the International Development Committee said the world's poorest countries were being "short-changed" by the government as the "political . 2019: Bilateral ODA to Africa increased by 125 million from 2,863 million in 2018 to 2,989 million in 2019, increasing by 4.4% (Figure 4). The UK government made a commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on ODA from 2013. For example, DFID contributed 112 million to the Global Partnership for Education, a multilateral organisation supporting close to 70 developing countries to ensure that every child receives a quality basic education, 11.8% was classed as Other, which includes Other Technical Assistance and Basket Funds. Multilateral organisations offer economies of scale in their operations and expertise, and often have the mandate and legitimacy to work in politically sensitive situations. Figure 16 shows the UK remained the third largest DAC donor in 2019 at 15.2 billion, behind the United States (27.1bn) and Germany (18.7bn). DEFRAs ODA spend also supports the conservation and sustainable management of natural resources and biodiversity, both terrestrial and marine, through initiatives including the Darwin Initiative and the Illegal Wildlife Trade Challenge Fund. Ethiopia was the largest among the African countries and second overall with around US$417 million. , Please see Table C6 in Excel Tables: Statistics on International Development 2019 for underlying data, From 2017, a single project could allocate spend to one or more sectors codes. 2019: In 2019, the volume of bilateral ODA to Asia was 2,470 million, increasing by 10.5% or 235 million from 2018 (Figure 4). DFIDs results estimates show what DFID has achieved in international development between 2015 and 2020. Gross National Income (GNI) per capita below the World Bank high-income threshold defines the coverage and boundaries of the list. The introduction of the grant-equivalent[footnote 24] measure in 2018 primarily affects countries with a high proportion of loans in their 2019 ODA portfolio. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) implemented a new methodology for calculating GDP in its September 2019 Blue Book (the UK National Account statistics), that in turn had an impact on Gross National Income (GNI). For further information on development issues and FCDO policies, please contact the Public Enquiry Point on 020 7008 5000. Over 5 years: Africa has consistently received the largest amount of UK ODA. UK foreign aid spending in 2016. This represents 0.5% of expected gross national income (GNI) and is a reduction in aid spending from the legislative target of 0.7%. By 2021 we could be spending about 14.5 billion, based on the Office for Budget Responsibility's forecasts and in 2016 prices. Japan - Japan is the largest contributor to foreign aid in Asia. This is unchanged from 2018. Further information on the data sources, quality and processing of the statistics in this publication are found in Annexes 1-3 on the Statistics on International Development webpage. In 2019, 659 million was delivered through the fund, an increase of 54 million compared to 2018. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts. In 2019, 42.4% (4,350m) of UK bilateral ODA was made up of spend that was not assigned to a single benefitting country or region (i.e. The estimates for 2018 can be found in our published Table A9 and A10. As the data in the publication is largely based on administrative data it is not subject to sampling error. Its activities include, among others, primary education, basic health services, clean water and sanitation, agriculture, business climate improvements, infrastructure, and institutional reforms. Within Health, the top three spending areas in 2019 were Medical Research (339m), Family Planning (252m) and Infectious Disease Control (182m). The CSSF is able to respond both to evolving security threats and unforeseen crises. Improvements to the system are being considered but for this publication, where this is the case spend is reported as bilateral ODA spend with no single benefitting country or region (section 4.1.5). In 2021, UK aid spending fell 21% compared to 2020 to stand at 11.4 billion. Unsurprisingly, the continent received the largest share of the UK's ODA budget in 2019 with US$4.2 billion. Dont include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details. , The Global Partnership for Education is an example of a sectoral-specific fund where amounts allocated to countries is not known in advance. Total bilateral ODA=10.3 billion, of which 4.4 billion (42.4%) is spent in unspecified countries/regions. Table 4 shows multilateral UK ODA in 2015, 2018 and 2019 by government agency and delivery channel i.e. The UK aid budget sits at around 11 billion, which includes 4 billion going to multilateral . Information on this spend can be found in the Office for National Statistics, Living costs and Food Survey or the Charities Aid Foundations UK giving report. In 2019, UK bilateral ODA to the region was 16 million, 0.3% of total UK bilateral ODA spend allocated to a region or country. Development Tracker. 4. Office for National Statistics technical assistance to build capacity of statistical systems in developing countries. Outside of the top 5 sectors by bilateral spend, the largest changes between 2018 and 2019 were Production Sectors (increased by 171m) and support for asylum seekers in the UK known as Refugees in Donor Countries (increased by 108m). This drop in ODA, moved Nigeria from being the third largest recipient of UK country-specific bilateral ODA in 2018 to fifth in 2019 (Figure 7), Nigerias lowest position in 5 years. This is largely driven by contributions to a Reconstruction Trust fund, Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo, Dem. C. Other = Other contributors of UK ODA, Scottish Government, Other In-Donor Refugee Costs, Colonial Pensions administered by DFID and Welsh Government. 24/11/22 04:38. Charities accuse chancellor of stealth raid on aid. Figure 3: Breakdown of UK ODA by contributor (2015, 2018 and 2019). , Defined as ODA-eligible multilateral organisations for core (unearmarked) contributions by the OECD DAC, see http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/annex2.htm, The UK may also provide funding to these organisations for specific programmes, which would be recorded as bilateral spend through a multilateral organisation. Such spend comprises of, for example, centrally-funded research or programmes that develop policies which aim to benefit several developing countries. Figure 13: Bilateral ODA by Government Department and Major Sector, 2019. , z is not applicable, 0 is null and ~ is less than half the smallest unit displayed. Other = Other government departments: Department of Health and Social, Prosperity Cross-Government Fund, HM Treasury, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department for Work and Pensions, Department for Education, HM Revenue and Customs, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports, Ministry of Defence, and Office for National Statistics, Department for International Trade. It also includes a summary of the government's current international development strategy and commentary on some of the issues affecting UK aid spending. Humanitarian Aid was the largest sector of ODA spend in 2019 (Figure 12). Multisector/Cross-Cutting - 1,325 million (12.9%). The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office is now responsible for producing the Statistics on International Development statistical series, the designation of National Statistics carries through to the new Department. The UKs share of total DAC ODA was 12.7 per cent. This follows a peak in 2017, in part driven by increased humanitarian assistance to conflict affected populations, South Sudan returned to the top 10 in 2019, becoming the third highest African recipient of UK bilateral country-specific ODA. See SID 2018 p.35 case study for more information on Developing Country Unspecified spend. The increase in bilateral spend was the largest increase seen since 2016, when the UK switched to the ESA 2010 methodology for GNI estimates, 3,066 million of bilateral ODA was delivered through multilateral organisations, an increase of 294 million compared to 2018. This information is primarily inputted by spending teams in DFID country offices and central departments, with some quality assurance carried out at input and centrally to ensure that spend is in line with OECD definitions of ODA ii) Other Government Departments and contributors some of which have similar databases to record ODA transaction data. First, total Russian net ODA disbursements nearly quadrupled from US$231 million in 2010 to US$902 million in 2015 (in constant 2015 dollars). Its worth noting that, like other multilateral organisations, core contributions to IDA are based on multi-year commitments which may not be uniformly spread across years, four of the top 5 receiving organisations of UK multilateral ODA in 2019 were among the top 5 multilaterals in 2018. The vertical dashed line indicates the 0.7% ODA:GNI UN target. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga uk foreign aid budget by country list DCMSs Cultural Protection Fund supports developing countries, mainly in Middle Eastern conflict zones, to protect and restore their cultural heritage. Largest donors of humanitarian aid worldwide 2022, by country. Australia's Official Development Assistance (ODA) will remain at $4 billion in 2020-21, down $44 million from last year and in line with the Government's freeze on aid funding expected to remain in place until 2022-23.. DfEs ODA covers support of asylum seekers in the first 12 months after they make a claim for asylum in the UK. The saving . The users represent the government, civil society and non-government organisations, students and academia and the media. For the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio, the GNI estimate is based on the pre-Blue Book 2019 framework since the first quarterly estimate of 2019 GNI under the new framework did not become available until 30 September 2019.