ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

@ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Sign in Thanks a lot. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to install ? Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. MediCAT Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. You can use these commands to format it: It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. Yes. Newbie. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. slax 15.0 boots UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. Level 1. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. And that is the right thing to do. my pleasure and gladly happen :) @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . Exactly. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. The virtual machine cannot boot. error was now displayed in 1080p. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. @steve6375 Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. Legacy? After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. DokanMounter If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. Tried it yesterday. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. There are many kinds of WinPE. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Some bioses have a bug. Have a question about this project? Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? Option 2: bypass secure boot its existence because of the context of the error message. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. Some known process are as follows: Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? ElementaryOS boots just fine. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> For these who select to bypass secure boot. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. Seriously? You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. I think it's OK. 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. size: 589 (617756672 byte) Not associated with Microsoft. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. Also, what GRUB theme are you using? Using Ventoy-1.0.08, ubuntudde-20.04-amd64-desktop.iso is still unable to boot under uefi. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. Still having issues? boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. For the two bugs. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. Is there any progress about secure boot support? access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar Customizing installed software before installing LM. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. ? Therefore, unless Ventoy makes it very explicit that "By enrolling Ventoy for Secure Boot, you understand that you are also granting anyone with the capability of running non Secure Boot enabled boot loaders on your computer, including potential malicious ones that would otherwise have been detected by Secure Boot", I will maintain that there is a rather important security issue that needs to be addressed. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. Have a question about this project? I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. Yes. Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. I didn't try install using it though. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate (not with the certificate trusted by EFI DB). Do I still need to display a warning message? And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). unsigned kernel still can not be booted. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. to your account. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB You signed in with another tab or window. You can repair the drive or replace it. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. @ventoy Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. Thanks! It only causes problems. Sorry for the late test. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). My guesd is it does not. I think it's OK. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. for the suggestions. If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Any suggestions, bugs? When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. 5. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Both are good. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it.